marksardella.com

Higher utility bills are tickling the limits of people’s ability to pay, and some investor-owned utilities (IOU’s) find themselves in poor cash positions as they struggle to collect on overdue accounts. Xcel Energy of Colorado now disconnects 600-650 customers daily, and reports that nearly one in five of its customers – or about a quarter million accounts – are in arrears. Xcel’s delinquent receivables are now a record $40 million. (Story – USA Today)

Public Service Company of New Mexico is having its own share of troubles as it tries to raise cash in the wake of a plunging stock price. PNM’s stock has recovered a bit from a low below $9 in March, but shares are still worth less than half the $35 they sold for a year ago. PNM shed its gas business in Santa Fe to raise cash, and is looking to sell other assets as well. They hope to fix their troubles by investing another $1.7 billion over the next 5 years, and concern about the rate impact of that investment has prompted Santa Fe to look into creating a public power authority.

Much of the trouble for IOU’s began with deregulation, when utilities confessed that the assets they were holding would be much less valuable in a competitive environment. Nobody could be expected to compete with 1960’s technology running at sub-thirty percent efficiency, could they? Now as these same utilities seek another big round of investment, investors and regulators are wary. Will we get competitive investments this time around?

There are good reasons to believe the answer is “no”. If anything, the regulatory landscape has tipped even further in favor of utilities. Most notable is the new trend toward revenue guarantees that ensure utility investments can be recovered in rates even as throughput drops on the system. But investors must be wondering why they should buy assets that can be so easily bypassed with distributed generation.

Besides, investors have better opportunities in the emerging “clean tech” sector, where distributed generation and load management technologies have made bi-directional, internet-style grids a reality. The Nordic countries still lead with their “active grid” technology, wherein connected resources actively participate in the health of the network, and soon enough these companies and their investors will pry open the U.S. market.

If active grids do get built here in the U.S., where would it leave our utilities? Waving their revenue guarantees in front of legislators and demanding a bailout, is my guess. It’ll have to be the taxpayers, because ratepayers will have left the system en masse to create active grids that can operate in parallel or stand-alone at will , delivering much higher efficiency.

The local economic benefits of creating an active grid that supports local, independent energy producers are too great to ignore any longer.

At the Green Business Networking meeting this morning, Bill Althouse gave a presentation on the reasons Santa Fe should consider creating a local electric utility. A lively discussion followed, and many members of the group expressed an interest in following the effort.

Santa Fe County Commissioner Paul Campos and City Councilor Chris Calvert have drafted a resolution to study the issue, which is posted here. (13kB PDF file)

The nonprofit Local Energy, which I chair, has created a new website to serve as the central communication point for this effort, and to follow similar energy localization efforts throughout the world. The new site is intended to be a clearinghouse for information on best practices for creating local energy systems that provide economic, environmental, and social benefits to communities. It is called Local Energy News, and it's already posted at www.localenergynews.org.

Until I get the email sign-up and subscription featues of the new site working, please sign up to my email list for this site, and I will add your names to the new site shortly.

Thanks for your interest and support of community-based energy! 

The amount of money leaking out of communities to pay for natural gas is rising as the price of natural gas rises. Even little Santa Fe County, New Mexico, with about 42,000 residential gas accounts, now loses more than $40 million annually as residents purchase the non-local heating fuel. Numbers from the analysis done by Local Energy are shown below, and a flyer for distributing the data can be downloaded here. I'll work on getting commercial numbers too.

 

 

Residents in and around Santa Fe, New Mexico who heat their homes with natural gas are now paying an estimated $14.08 per million BTU of delivered heat – up from $13.78 per million BTU a year ago, while gas-fired heat for domestic hot water is $18.08 per million BTU this year compared to $17.31 per million BTU last year. All prices are calculated for the period beginning July 1 and ending June 30.

 

 

 

Costs shown include fuel delivery charges and taxes. Current year costs are estimated.

 

The cost of heating with natural gas has been trending upwards at more than 12 percent per year over the past 10 years.

 

Click to read more ...

Question: What can communities do to begin getting their heating needs met locally?

Many commercial facilities -- especially schools and large commercial buildings -- already have hydronic heating systems, with the water in most cases heated using propane or natural gas. Every large facility building with hydronic heating should install a Thermal Access Port™ in the facility’s boiler-return pipe to enable energy from an outside source to be injected into the building. A revenue-grade BTU meter must be installed across the heat exchanger to track the energy delivered to the facility. Local Energy installed such a system at the Santa Fe Community College, and successfully tested the system. Installation of the port cost less than $12,000, including engineering, parts, and subcontract labor. See Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1. Installation of a Thermal Access Port™

Click to read more ...